Skip to main content
European Commission logo
Expert Network on Economics and Sociology of Education and Training (ENESET)
  • Report

Mechanisms and methods for cost-benefit / cost-effectiveness analysis of specific education programmes

Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses help policymakers assess the social returns of education programmes and prioritize investments that yield the greatest impact.

Details

Publication date
7 March 2014
Authors
Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture | European Expert Network on Economics of Education (EENEE)
Geographical scope
  • European Union
Level of education focus
  • Adult education
  • Early childhood education and care (ECEC)
  • Higher education
  • School education
  • Vocational education and training (VET)
Thematic areas covered
  • Education-to-work transitions, education and labour market
  • Educational effectiveness and efficiency
  • Governance of education
  • Investment in education, economic impact of education
  • Lifelong learning
  • Monitoring and quality assurance
  • Quality and inclusive education for all
  • Skills development
  • Teachers and trainers
  • Whole-school and whole-system approaches and partnerships in education

Description

This report discusses how cost-benefit (CBA) and cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) can support education policymaking by providing evidence on the economic value of different programmes. These tools help assess not only private returns but also broader societal impacts.

Education poses specific challenges for these methods, due to long time horizons, uncertainty of outcomes, and difficulties in monetizing non-market benefits such as civic participation or better health. Nevertheless, careful application of CBA and CEA can yield meaningful insights.

The report outlines step-by-step methodologies for conducting both types of analysis, including choosing proper outcome metrics, estimating future benefits, discounting, and considering externalities.

Several real-world examples are provided to illustrate applications and common pitfalls, such as high deadweight losses or inappropriate comparison groups. While few EU countries systematically use these tools in education, the authors argue that they should be mainstreamed.

In conclusion, the report calls for building institutional capacity, encouraging a culture of evaluation, and using CBA and CEA more widely to ensure cost-effective, evidence-based education policies.

Authors

Daniel Münich and George Psacharopoulos

Cite as

Münich, D., & Psacharopoulos, G. (2014). Mechanisms and methods for cost-benefit / cost-effectiveness analysis of specific education programmes. EENEE Analytical Report No. 19.

Cover

Files

  • 7 MARCH 2014
Mechanisms and methods for cost-benefit / cost-effectiveness analysis of specific education programmes – Analytical report
  • 19 JANUARY 2015
Mechanisms and methods for cost-benefit / cost-effectiveness analysis of specific education programmes – Policy brief